Qualifications, schmualifications, Dr. King.
Posted by pittgirl on 28 Oct 2005 | Tagged as: Uncategorized
Burghers? I’ve had about enough of this guy.
They gave him a cushy no-show $125k job and he is still suing the school board.
“The suit described Mr. Roosevelt (the newly hired superintendent) as less qualified than Dr. King.”
You know what Dr. King, if that is your real name? Having sex in cars with homeless people behind elementary schools and getting arrested for it while you are married pulls the dimmer switch on any “qualifications” you might have. We call that a demerit. But you don’t just get ONE demerit for having sex in cars with homeless people behind elementary schools and getting arrested for it while married. No, you get like sixty-five-thousand bajillion demerits.
In the same universe that houses Kato Kaelin, Paris Hilton, Omarosa, and Tonya Harding, you sir are the lamest lame-o that ever did lame.
Take your cushy, high-paying, no show job and enjoy it. Don’t try to drag the school board down with a ridiculous lawsuit.
5 Comments »
on 28 Oct 2005 at 3:20 pm 1.Anonymous said …
Does that make him Annoying Pittsburgher of the Week? Maybe he can try for the hat trick…
on 28 Oct 2005 at 3:28 pm 2.pittgirl said …
I thought of that, it’s just this is so far PAST annoying I can’t even SEE annoying from here. Annoying is a dot on the horizon from here.
on 29 Oct 2005 at 9:56 am 3.Amos_thePokerCat said …
Mentioning “trick” and Andrew King is just funny on so many different levels.
on 31 Oct 2005 at 3:37 pm 4.rob said …
Did you see Brian O’Neill’s column in yesterday’s PG? Here’s a choice excerpt:
“My guess is Dr. King was duly considered, and the consideration went something like this.
‘King? The guy caught having sex with a woman not his wife in the back of a tuck?’
‘No, to run a system with 31,000 children, we’ll take a role model, not a roll model.’
‘Next.’”
on 31 Oct 2005 at 9:56 pm 5.pittgirl said …
Must go find that article…. bye.