It’s a blob!
Posted by pittgirl on 30 Oct 2007 | Tagged as: Eye rolls
So I got an email from WPXI telling me that I would be very interested to know that Bigfoot lives in Pennsylvania.
And they have proof.
See?
Yeah. Me either.
I’d have gone with any of the following:
- A blob.
- A Rorschach test to which I would respond, “A blob!”
- A succubus
- The chupacabra
- The disease that lives in Jeff Reed’s pants
I love that WPXI has this on their front page entitled “Bigfoot images captured by hunter” instead of “Purported” or “Alleged” or “Possible” or “Grainy” images.
Jacob said that after a week of trying to decipher the image, he contacted the Bigfoot Research Organization.
Researchers said they believe the images are of a young Bigfoot — or juvenile Sasquatch.
Awesome!
(h/t also to Arika)
13 Comments »
on 30 Oct 2007 at 10:56 am 1.curtO said …
The pictures get a little clearer over at another website…yeah, just a baby bear staring right at the camera…
http://www.barsmart.com/viewtopic.cfm?topic=EEED3696-E419-C05D-6E64E4E76E2CC182
on 30 Oct 2007 at 1:18 pm 2.Caryn said …
Maybe it’s a Furry lost from the convention. At least the PG put a question mark after “Bigfoot in PA” and I love the comment under the photo: “some people think it is the famed Sasquatch while others say it is a bear with a skin infection.” Poor Yogi. Now there will be kooks all over the forest. Crazy. Nuts.
on 30 Oct 2007 at 1:35 pm 3.Pensgirl said …
Maybe by leaving off “Alleged” and its ilk, PXI is just finally admitting that it’s a tabloid channel.
on 30 Oct 2007 at 1:39 pm 4.plexxer said …
“Researchers said they believe the images are of a young Bigfoot — or juvenile Sasquatch.”
That’s their answer for everything.
on 30 Oct 2007 at 1:49 pm 5.chrys said …
LOL!! I saw this last night on wtae.. Wendy Bell and Mike Clark barely kept straight faces. I can’t believe that even made the news. Slow news day?
on 30 Oct 2007 at 2:05 pm 6.Mia` said …
No way! “Researchers” from the Big Foot Research Org believe it is a picture of Big Foot?!?! Wow! Imagine that!
I talked to a friend of mine about this last night. She works for the game commission and is the leading expert in black bears in the state (according to her, never double checked her, never doubted her either). Anyway, she hadn’t seen the pictures, but I described them and she agreed with the probability that it was a young black bear with mange - not baby bear cub, but young bear. She said that a bear with long legs like in this picture would tell you that it’s a young bear. Guess bears have that ackward gangly age too.
on 30 Oct 2007 at 8:01 pm 7.Still A. Fan said …
i’m hearing baby bear with mange.
isn’t that a christmas song?
“away, with a mange bear……”
>
ok, sorry.
on 30 Oct 2007 at 10:08 pm 8.pgh412 said …
Looks like bigfoot is doing downward facing dog. Too funny.
on 30 Oct 2007 at 11:51 pm 9.J said …
Sure it’s not Jeff Reed stumbling through the woods after a random Halloween hookup?
on 30 Oct 2007 at 11:57 pm 10.marco said …
It’s definitely a bear with mange: http://www.terrierman.com/mangeinblackbearflorida.jpg
on 31 Oct 2007 at 6:07 am 11.Ed Heath said …
Downward facing dog, or maybe it’s mooning the camera.
on 31 Oct 2007 at 8:21 am 12.deegazette said …
Hello, I am new to posting and I know I am risking getting a rep as a nutcase in the blogosphere, (is that even possible?), but my son thinks he saw a baby bear in our backyard the other day. We have a septic tank contraption for our dog’s crap and my husband was treating it. He came in and said that some LARGE animal had taken a dump near it. Has anyone seen a baby bear in East Brookline basking in the beautiful sunlight?
on 03 Nov 2007 at 7:22 pm 13.Jimmy the Shoe said …
Bigfoot? It’s feet are tiny. It’s a BigHead.